After
reading my ISAD submission, The Right
Time to Break Out the Stickers, (see previous blog posting) many graduate
students in speech therapy acknowledged that it might not be such a good idea
to give rewards to a child for successfully using speech tools, but they asked
about rewards for “paying attention, doing something correct, positive speech
behaviors, doing their best job, confidence, good talking, etc… As one student
put it “speech therapists give out stickers like there’s no tomorrow!”
Everyone, just step back and take a deep breath. .. and enough already!
I
did asked myself … if I felt speech therapists were trained to provide
treatment focused on keeping them talking rather than reducing speech errors,
would I be so bothered by the inclusion of stickers (or applause, or praise, or
candy)? My conclusion? Yes I would.
So
at the risk of getting a bit sidetracked, I will focus again
on rewards. I was inspired by the writings of Australian
psychologist and author, Robin Grille*.
Grille’s primary audience is parents, but he helps us all to understand
the shortcomings of the ever-so-popular practice of giving out rewards to
children. I will be using excerpts from
his article, Rewards and Praise: The
Poisoned Carrot that I feel are most relevant to speech therapists and
parents of children who stutter. (You
can view the full article at
http://www.naturalchild.org/robin_grille/rewards_praise.html):
Grille
states that
● “Rewards and praise condition children to seek approval;
they end up doing things to impress, instead of doing things for themselves.
This can hold back the development of self-motivation and makes them dependent
on outside opinion. When children get used to getting goodies for ‘performing,’
they become pleasers, over-reliant on positive strokes. Rewards and praise can
create a kind of addictive behavior: children can get addicted to recognition,
and thus lose touch with the simple joy of doing what they love.”
● One of the worst
things we can do is to praise a child's potential. Acclamations like "I
just know you can do it", "You're getting better!", "I know
you've got it in you!", "You'll get there!" sound supportive on
the surface. Underneath the praise is the silent implication: "you're not good
enough yet".
The
last impression you want a child who stutters to walk away with is “you’re not
good enough.” I do believe there can be
a healthy balance between doing everything for themselves and doing things to
impress. The extreme ends of either of
these motivators lead to obvious problems, depending on the circumstances. But let’s face it…we want kids who are
comfortable enough in their own skins to express their feelings, not kids who are
overly-motivated to impress others. We
want kids who are self-motivated, with their sense of self and well-being not
reliant on external praise and rewards.
Grille goes on to say:
● When children are
bribed with rewards for "good" behavior, they soon learn how to
manipulate us by acting the part that is expected of them. They become
superficially compliant, doing whatever it takes to flatter or impress us, and
honesty suffers. After all, who wants to be honest or real with a person who is
evaluating them?
Children
are under constant evaluation and being judged all day in school. Therapists are trained to do the same. This does not inspire honesty or being in
touch with your true feelings.
Eli
hated practicing his speech tools at home, or doing anything that focused on
his speech struggles. No matter what
game I adapted to the process, which book I pulled out, or how hard I clapped
my hands and assured him it was going to be fun, he still hated it. Oh, and he did express his true feelings --
“This is sta sta sta stupid!, why does the fa fa fa fa fa fa focus of
eeeeeeeeeeeeverything have to be on my speech?”
I didn’t listen. I forged on,
assuming that even though it felt stupid to him, at some point he would find it
useful. I did nothing to acknowledge or
appreciate his honesty. Grille is so
right when he states:
● Rewarding
children's compliance is the flip-side of punishing their disobedience. It is
seduction in the place of tyranny
Until
now I have never considered rewards to be equivalent to tyranny. But I think Grille is right on the money. It’s too easy for kids to lose touch with
what they are really thinking and feeling when they are being seduced with stickers
and praise. Eli never told a speech
therapist that he thought speech tools were too hard or stupid. He did exactly what they told him to do. He was compliant and well-mannered and got
lots of stickers for “paying attention, doing something correct, positive
speech behaviors, doing his best job, confidence, good talking, etc…” We all rewarded him over and over again
– I was always so proud .
So
instead of “giving out stickers like there’s no tomorrow,” let’s focus instead on
creating a space where these kids can safely build their courage and capacity
for honesty and self-expression. It’s
time to set our egos aside. We need to keep
them talking!
Best,
Dori
Lenz Holte
So very true, I myself have the access to observe graduate students in therapy and I have seen them always hand out stickers but at the end of the sessions. They rewarded them for doing good jobs and having good behavior during their exercises. Observing this, I too have wondered if those "rewards" are worth anything to the child. I even wondered if stickers were an appropriate praise to doing a good job. Good post.
ReplyDeleteThank you Heather for commenting -- It's always so rewarding when adults who stutter resonate with my messages. You have such a valuable perspective! Appreciate your joining in on the conversation! Would love to hear more about your experiences...
ReplyDelete